ON TARGET - Weekly Journal from Target Health Inc.

(Complimentary Newsletter from Target Health Inc.)

[Home] [Target e*CRO] [Target e*CRF] [Publications] [Press Release] [Advisors] [FDA Process] [Advertising]

20 November 2006

I.  WHAT'S NEW?
   
Intellectual Property At Target Health
II.  QUIZ - (Fill In The Blanks)

    Mirror Neurons
III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE
    Germ Theory
IV.
ONCOLOGY

    The Roles of NK and NKT Cells in Liver Cancer
V. DRUG SAFETY
   
Epoetin Alfa in Chronic Kidney Disease - New Safety Data
VI. ARTHRITIS
   
Safety Data on a New COX-2 Inhibitor Etoricoxib (Merck)

VII. EPIDEMIOLOGY
    Midlife Risk Factors and Healthy Survival in Men
VIII.
REGULATORY AFFAIRS
    Electronic Signatures and Submissions - FDA Public Hearing

IX. TARGET HEALTH

I.
WHAT'S NEW

Intellectual Property At Target Health 

Target Health is pleased to announce a series of registered trademarks championed by Vanessa Hays. Trademarks include Target Health®, Target Document®, ON TARGET® (with logo), Target e*CRF®, the Target Health Logo, Target Health Rotating Cube®. Pending trademarks include Target Studio™, Target Console™, Target Runtime™ and Target Encoder™.

For more information about Target Health, please contact  Dr. Jules T. Mitchel.

II. QUIZ (Fill  In The Blanks)

Mirror Neurons

A mirror neuron is a neuron which 1) ___ both when an animal performs an action and when the animal 2) ___ the same action performed by another, especially conspecific (same species) animals. Thus, the neuron 3) "___" the behavior of another animal, as though the observer were himself performing the action. These neurons have been observed in primates, especially humans, and in some birds. In humans, they have been found in Broca's area, and the inferior parietal cortex of the 4) ___. Some scientists consider mirror neurons one of the most important findings of 5) ___ in the last decade. In the monkey, mirror neurons are found in the inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule. These neurons are 6) ___ when the monkeys perform certain tasks, but they also fire when the monkeys watch someone else perform the same specific task. Researchers using functional MRI (fMRI), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), and electroencephalogram (EEG), have found evidence of a similar system of matching observations with actions, in the human brain. The function of the mirror system is a subject of much speculation. These neurons may be important for understanding the actions of other people, and for learning new skills by 7) ___. Some researchers also speculate that mirror systems may simulate observed actions, and thus contribute to our theory of mind skills, while others relate mirror neurons to language abilities. It has also been proposed that problems with the mirror system may underlie cognitive disorders, in particular 8) ___.

ANSWERS: 1) fires; 2) observes; 3) mirrors; 4) brain; 5) neuroscience; 6) active; 7) imitation; 8) autism

III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE

Germ Theory

The ancient historical view was that disease was spontaneously generated instead of being created by microorganisms which grow by reproduction. One of the earliest references of germ theory appears in "On Agriculture" by Marcus Terentius Varro (published in 36 BCE) wherein there is a warning about locating a homestead in the proximity of swamps which reads "...and because there are bred certain minute creatures which cannot be seen by the eyes, which float in the air and enter the body through the mouth and nose and there cause serious diseases". Girolamo Fracastoro proposed in 1546 that epidemic diseases are caused by transferable seedlike entities that could transmit infection by direct or indirect contact or even without contact over long distances. Microorganisms were first observed by Anton van Leeuwenhoek, who is considered the father of microbiology. The Italian Agostino Bassi is often credited with having stated the germ theory of disease for the first time, based on his observations on the lethal and epidemic muscardine disease of silkworms. In 1835 he specifically blamed the deaths of the insects on a contagious, living agent, that was visible to the naked eye as powdery spore masses; this microscopic fungus was subsequently called Beauveria bassiana in his honor. (edited by Alex Hays)

IV. ONCOLOGY

The Roles of NK and NKT Cells in Liver Cancer  

Natural killer (NK) cells are specialized immune cells named for their inherent ability to respond swiftly to the invasion of pathogens without prior stimulation. They are able to recognize specific proteins on the surface of abnormal or infected cells and respond by releasing enzymes that poke holes in a target cell's membrane and killing the cell. Tumor cells can also be besieged by NK cells if they "lack" the proper surface markers that designate them as being normal "self" cells. These markers tell patrolling NK cells that normal cells should not be attacked. Cancer cells sometimes have missing or altered markers on their surface, making them targets for NK cells. Natural killer T (NKT) cells are another type of cell that share some characteristics with NK cells, but have only recently been appreciated for their role in immune defense. In contrast to NK cells, some NKT cells have been implicated in dampening the immune response to invading pathogens, rather than initiating an attack. However, both NK and NKT cells secrete, and in turn are controlled by, interleukins (ILs). Many different types of ILs, each carrying its own message between cells, are sent and received by a variety of cell types. IL-12 and IL-18 are two interleukins that, when received by NK and NKT cells, activate the cells' immune response and relay the signal by triggering the release of another immune messenger molecule, interferon-gamma (IFN- ealpha). According to an article published in Cancer Research (2006;66:11005-11012), NK and NKT cells, which play divergent roles in fighting cancer, have been identified in the liver. It has also been shown that the activities of these cells can be manipulated by treating mice with interleukins, biological response chemicals that dial up or down the body's natural immune response, to simultaneously stimulate helpful NK cells and alter the sometimes detrimental effects of NKT cells to combat cancer in the liver. Because large populations of NK and NKT cells are present in the liver, the authors examined the potential for using IL-12 and IL-18 together as a therapeutic regimen against tumors that originate in, or spread to, the liver. Results showed that treating mice that had cancer with IL-18/IL-12 induced high levels of IFN- ealpha and greatly reduced the number of tumors in the liver. Interestingly, it was also noticed that treatment with IL-18/IL-12 not only increased numbers of NK cells in the liver, but also decreased the number of NKT cells that could be detected. Rather than restricting the immune system's ability to fight cancer, altering or eliminating NKT cells further inhibited tumor growth. The authors further explored this phenomenon by studying mice that had been engineered to lack NKT cells. Results showed that this tumor regression was enhanced when these mice were treated with interleukins. Conversely, reducing the population of NK cells decreased the anti-tumor effect of IL-18/IL-12 therapy in these animals. According to the authors, taken together, these results imply that anti-tumor activity induced in mice by IL-18 and IL-12 is dependent on both NK cells and IFN- ealpha, and is able to overcome the immunosuppressive effect of NKT cells. The authors added that since the liver is a target organ for the spread of many types of tumors, including kidney, colorectal, and breast cancer, all of which can be lethal in part based on their spread to vital organs such as the liver, approaches that enhance immune responses against cancer in the liver might be beneficial for cancer patients with tumors that arise in, or metastasize to, the liver. 

V. DRUG SAFETY

Epoetin Alfa in Chronic Kidney Disease - New Safety Data   

Anemia, a common complication of chronic kidney disease, usually develops as a consequence of erythropoietin deficiency. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alpha) is indicated for the correction of anemia associated with this condition. Based on results of an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2006;355:2085-2098), FDA has notified healthcare professionals that patients treated with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) and dosed to a target hemoglobin concentration of 13.5 g/dL are at a significantly increased risk for serious and life threatening cardiovascular complications, as compared to use of the ESA to target a hemoglobin concentration of 11.3 g/dL. reports the adverse cardiovascular complications as a composite of the occurrence of one of the following events: death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, or stroke. For this open-label study, of 1,432 patients with chronic kidney disease, 715 were randomly assigned to receive a dose of epoetin alpha targeted to achieve a hemoglobin level of 13.5 g per deciliter and 717 were assigned to receive a dose targeted to achieve a level of 11.3 g per deciliter. The median study duration was 16 months. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (without renal replacement therapy), and stroke. During the study there were a total of 222 composite events: 125 events in the high-hemoglobin group, as compared with 97 events in the low-hemoglobin group (hazard ratio, 1.34; P=0.03). Improvements in the quality of life were similar in the two groups but more patients in the high-hemoglobin group had at least one serious adverse event. According to the authors, the use of a target hemoglobin level of 13.5 g/dL (as compared with 11.3 g/dL) was associated with increased risk and no incremental improvement in the quality of life.

VI. ARTHRITIS

Safety Data on a New COX-2 Inhibitor Etoricoxib (Merck) 

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors (e.g Vioxx) have been associated with an increased risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events in placebo-controlled trials, but no clinical trial has been reported with the primary aim of assessing relative cardiovascular risk of these drugs compared with traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). According to an article published in The Lancet (2006;368:1771-1781), a clinical trial was designed to provide a precise estimate of thrombotic cardiovascular events with the COX-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib (Merck) versus the traditional NSAID diclofenac. For this investigation, a prespecified pooled analysis was performed of data from three trials in which patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to etoricoxib (60 mg or 90 mg daily) or diclofenac (150 mg daily). The primary hypothesis stated that etoricoxib is not inferior to diclofenac, defined as an upper boundary of less than 1.30 for the 95% CI of the hazard ratio for thrombotic cardiovascular events in the per-protocol analysis. Intention-to-treat analyses were also done to assess consistency of results. Within the three studies, 34,701 patients (24,913 with osteoarthritis and 9,787 with rheumatoid arthritis) were enrolled. Average treatment duration was 18 months (SD 11.8). In terms of safety, 320 patients in the etoricoxib group and 323 in the diclofenac group had thrombotic cardiovascular events, yielding event rates of 1.24 and 1.30 per 100 patient-years and a hazard ratio of 0.95 for etoricoxib compared with diclofenac. Rates of upper gastrointestinal clinical events (perforation, bleeding, obstruction, ulcer) were lower with etoricoxib than with diclofenac (0.67 vs 0.97 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 0•69, but the rates of complicated upper gastrointestinal events were similar for etoricoxib (0.30) and diclofenac (0.32). According to the authors, rates of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with arthritis on etoricoxib are similar to those in patients on diclofenac with long-term use of these drugs. 

VII. EPIDEMIOLOGY

Midlife Risk Factors and Healthy Survival in Men

According to an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (2006;296:2343-2350), a study was performed to test whether midlife biological, lifestyle, and sociodemographic risk factors are associated with overall survival and exceptional survival (free of a set of major diseases and impairments). The investigation was a prospective cohort study within the Honolulu Heart Program/Honolulu Asia Aging Study. A total of 5,820 Japanese American middle-aged men (mean age, 54 [range, 45-68] years) free of morbidity and functional impairments were followed for up to 40 years (1965-2005) to assess overall and exceptional survival. Exceptional survival was defined as survival to a specified age (75, 80, 85, or 90 years) without incidence of 6 major chronic diseases and without physical and cognitive impairment. The main outcome measure was overall survival and exceptional survival. Of the 5,820 original participants, 2,451 participants (42%) survived to age 85 years and 655 participants (11%) met the criteria for exceptional survival to age 85 years. Results showed that high grip strength and avoidance of overweight, hyperglycemia, hypertension, smoking, and excessive alcohol consumption were associated with both overall and exceptional survival. In addition, high education and avoidance of hypertriglyceridemia were associated with exceptional survival, while lack of a marital partner was associated with mortality before age 85 years. Risk factor models based on cumulative risk factors (survival risk score) suggest that the probability of survival to oldest age is as high as 69% with no risk factors and as low as 22% with 6 or more risk factors. The probability of exceptional survival to age 85 years was 55% with no risk factors but decreased to 9% with 6 or more risk factors. It was concluded that the data suggest that avoidance of certain risk factors in midlife is associated with the probability of a long and healthy life among men.

VIII. REGULATORY AFFAIRS

TARGET HEALTH excels in Regulatory Affairs and works closely with many of its clients performing all FDA submissions. TARGET HEALTH receives daily updates of new developments at FDA. Each week, highlights of what is going on at FDA are shared to assure that new information is expeditiously made available.

Electronic Signatures and Submissions - FDA Public Hearing

The FDA announced plans to hold a public hearing to solicit comments and information on the electronic submission of product information. The Agency is also interested in hearing the public's perspectives on issues related to creating an electronic information exchange platform. Information provided at the hearing will help FDA shape a modern paperless submission process and help facilitate the effective use of submitted information, including drug safety information. FDA sits on the world's singular repository of drug safety and effectiveness information, but as long as a lot of it remains locked away in paper archives, it is hard for FDA to explore ways to leverage this knowledge while protecting confidential commercial information. FDA stated that if it could receive information in a consistent electronic format it would help it make more effective use of important drug information especially in safety situations. The announcement follows numerous steps taken by the agency over the past ten years to transform all regulatory submissions from paper to electronic means. To meet this goal, FDA has issued regulations enabling voluntary electronic submission of regulatory information; provided a docket listing all submissions that the agency accepts electronically; and issued guidance documents to assist in the submission of various regulatory documents in electronic format. The scope of the upcoming hearing will include the following issues related to an all-electronic environment. 

  • feasibility issues related to the electronic submission of premarket submissions and other regulatory information; and
  • issues related to the concept and feasibility of an electronic platform that would facilitate the exchange of clinical research information and other regulatory product information, the role of a public/private partnership helping the creation and assessment of such an electronic platform, and the management of the platform after its creation by a private entity with the relevant technological expertise.

The hearing is scheduled to be held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on December 18, 2006, at the Advisors and Consultants Staff Conference Room, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Registration on the day of the public hearing will be provided on a space available basis beginning at 7:30 a.m.

For more information about our expertise in Regulatory Affairs, please contact Dr. Jules T. Mitchel or Dr. Glen Park.

IX. TARGET HEALTH

TARGET HEALTH INC. (www.targethealth.com) is a full service e*CRO with full-time staff dedicated to all aspects of drug and device development. Areas of expertise include Regulatory Affairs, comprising, but not limited to, IND, IDE, NDA, PMA and 510(k) submissions, execution of Clinical Trials, Project Management, Biostatistics and Data Management, Web Trials, utilizing Target e*CRF®, our proprietary Internet-based Clinical Trial System, and Medical Writing. TARGET HEALTH's Pharmaceutical Advisory Dream Team (PADT) assists companies in strategic planning from Discovery to Market Launch. Let us help you on your next project.

TARGET HEALTH INC.
261 Madison Avenue
24th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 681-2100; Fax (212) 681-2105

Target Health Ad
www.targethealth.com
Dr. Jules T. Mitchel,
President
Ms Joyce Hays,
CEO

©2006 Target Health Inc. All rights reserved