ON TARGET
COMPLIMENTARY NEWS LETTER OF TARGET HEALTH
® INC.

11 March 2007

I.  WHAT'S NEW?
   
Partnering With CROs - Available Software Tools
II.  QUIZ - (Fill In The Blanks)

    Transgenic Pigs and Brain Power
III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE
    Maggot Therapy - Part 1

IV. EPIDEMIOLOGY
    Atkins Diet Wins
V. INFECTIOUS DISEASE
    Bird Flu - What Can We Learn From the 1918 Pandemic
VI. CARDIOLOGY
   
The Jury is Still Out on Medicated Stents
VII. REGULATORY AFFAIRS
   
Tekturna (Novartis) Approved for Treatment of Hypertension
VIII. TARGET HEALTH

I.
WHAT'S NEW

Partnering With CROs - Available Software Tools

Target Health has developed Internet-based software tools which will give competitive advantages to CROs as well as Pharmaceutical and Device companies. Through Target e*CRF®, we work collaboratively with many CROs. The following are our software tools:

  1. Target Document® can revolutionize clinical trial document management in a cost effective way and includes a communication tool
  2. Target e*CRF® Version 1 can be provided as a service to CROs and comes with Project Management and a communication tool
  3. Target e*CRF® Version 3.1 (available April 2007) can be brought in-house and is very cost effective
  4. Target Encoder™ for MedDRA and WHODRUG
  5. Target Newsletter™ for communications to clinical sites 
  6. Target Patient Profiler™ to evaluate individual patients in a graphic mode

For more information, please contact  Dr. Jules T. Mitchel. Visit our Blog and Website.

II. QUIZ (Fill  In The Blanks)

Transgenic Pigs and Brain Power 

Pigs can be 1) ___ to produce large quantities of omega-3 fatty acids, found at high concentrations in foods such as flax seeds and certain fish. Transgenic pork containing omega-3s would avoid the potential problem of 2) ___ found in some fish, and also circumvent fears about over-fishing. Omega-3s are still thought to 3) ___ brain power. A team at Harvard Medical School in Boston used 4) techniques to produce piglets carrying a version of a gene from a nematode 5) ___ that converts unhealthy omega-6 fatty acids into omega-3s. 6) ___ made up an average of 8% of the total fat in muscles of the six transgenic pigs, compared with 1 to 2 per cent in normal pigs.

ANSWERS: 1) engineered; 2) mercury; 3) boost; 4) cloning; 5) worm; 6) Omega-3s 

III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE

Maggot Therapy - Part 1

Maggot Debridement Therapy (MDT), also known as larval therapy, is a type of biotherapy involving the intentional introduction by a health care practitioner of live, disinfected maggots (fly larvae) into the non-healing skin and soft tissue wound(s) of a human or animal for the purpose of selectively cleaning out only the necrotic (dead) tissue within a wound in order to promote wound healing. Written records have documented that maggots have been used since antiquity as a safe and effective wound treatment. There are reports of the successful use of maggots for wound healing by Mayan Indians and aboriginal tribes in Australia. There also have been reports of the use of maggot treatment in the Renaissance times. During warfare, many military physicians observed that soldiers whose wounds had become colonized with maggots experienced significantly less morbidity and mortality than soldiers whose wounds had not become colonized. These physicians included Napoleon’s surgeon general, Baron Larrey, who reported during France's Egyptian campaign in Syria, 1829, that certain species of fly destroyed only dead tissue and had a positive effect on wound healing. Dr. Joseph Jones, a ranking Confederate medical officer during the American Civil War, is quoted as follows, "I have frequently seen neglected wounds ... filled with maggots ... as far as my experience extends, these worms only destroy dead tissues, and do not injure specifically the well parts." The first therapeutic use of maggots is credited to a second Confederate medical officer Dr. J.F. Zacharias, who reported during the American Civil War that, "Maggots ... in a single day would clean a wound much better than any agents we had at our command ... I am sure I saved many lives by their use. " He recorded a high survival rate in patients he treated with maggots. Edited by Alex Hays

IV. EPIDEMIOLOGY

Atkins Diet Wins    

Popular diets, particularly those low in carbohydrates, have challenged current recommendations advising a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet for weight loss. According to some, potential benefits and risks have not been tested adequately. As a result, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (2007;297:969-977) was performed to compare 4 weight-loss diets representing a spectrum of low to high carbohydrate intake for effects on weight loss and related metabolic variables. The investigation was a 12-month randomized trial conducted in the United States from February 2003 to October 2005 among 311 overweight/obese (body mass index, 27-40) nondiabetic, premenopausal women. Study, participants were randomly assigned to follow the Atkins (n = 77), Zone (n = 79), LEARN (n = 79), or Ornish (n = 76) diets and received weekly instruction for 2 months, with an additional follow-up visit at 10-months. The main outcome measure was weight loss at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included lipid profile (low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels), percentage of body fat, waist-hip ratio, fasting insulin and glucose levels, and blood pressure. Outcomes were assessed at months 0, 2, 6, and 12. Results showed that weight loss was greater for women in the Atkins diet group compared with the other diet groups at 12 months, and mean 12-month weight loss was significantly different between the Atkins and Zone diets (P<.05). Mean 12-month weight loss was as follows: Atkins, –4.7 kg, LEARN, –2.6 kg, Ornish, –2.2 kg and Zone, –1.6 kg. Weight loss was not statistically different among the Zone, LEARN, and Ornish groups. At 12 months, secondary outcomes for the Atkins group were comparable with or more favorable than the other diet groups. According to the authors, based on the data from the study, premenopausal overweight and obese women assigned to follow the Atkins diet, which had the lowest carbohydrate intake, lost more weight and experienced more favorable overall metabolic effects at 12 months than women assigned to follow the Zone, Ornish, or LEARN diets. The authors added that while questions remain about long-term effects and mechanisms, a low-carbohydrate, high-protein, high-fat diet may be considered a feasible alternative recommendation for weight loss.

V. INFECTIOUS DISEASE

Bird Flu - What Could We Learn From the 1918 Pandemic    

Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses have primarily infected wild birds and domestic poultry populations in dozens of countries, although at least 275 people have been infected and 167 have died. Concern that the H5N1 avian influenza virus could trigger an influenza pandemic, past pandemics are being looked at, including the 1918 "Spanish Flu," for insight into pandemic planning. However, in a Journal of Infectious Diseases review article published online (2007;DOI: 10.1086/511989), it was concluded that studies of the 1918 influenza pandemic, which killed some 50 to 100 million people around the globe, have so far raised more questions than they answer. According to authors, a treasure trove of journal articles and other materials exist in many languages that can be mined for novel information with practical applications relevant to the threat of pandemic influenza. The review addresses several topics, including the origins of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus, the excess mortality of the pandemic, the predilection to kill the young and healthy, the lower-than-expected mortality among the elderly, and the cyclicity of influenza pandemics over the past 100 years. One of the great unsolved mysteries surrounding the 1918 pandemic is why, unlike yearly influenza epidemics, in which death rates are highest among infants, the elderly and those with chronic health conditions, the 1918 influenza pandemic took its greatest toll on healthy adults between the ages of 20 and 40. One possible explanation, supported by recent studies in mice with a reconstructed version of the 1918 virus, is that an over-responsive immune system may release a "cytokine storm," or excessive amount of immune system proteins that trigger inflammation and harm the patient in the process. Of note, most deaths among humans infected with the H5N1 avian influenza virus have occurred in individuals under the age of 40. However, as the authors point out, it is not yet known whether there is a higher percentage of young people in the affected populations compared to older people, whether younger people are more susceptible to infection or whether they have more exposure to infected birds. According to the article, the H1N1 virus that caused the 1918 pandemic appears to be avian in origin, but the host source of the 1918 virus has never been identified. Furthermore, no major disease outbreaks among birds were documented immediately before the 1918 pandemic. The authors suggest that an avian influenza strain could have been hidden in an obscure ecological niche, and the pandemic strain arose by the genetic adaptation of that avian virus to a new human host. From the pathologist’s perspective, most pandemic deaths were associated with either an aggressive bronchopneumonia, in which bacteria could be cultivated from lung tissue at autopsy, or with a severe acute respiratory distress-like syndrome (ARDS) characterized by blue-grey facial discoloration and excessive fluid in the lungs. In neither case, is it known whether most deaths were caused by a secondary bacterial infection or a primary viral infection. The authors propose that the many excess deaths that occurred during the 1918 influenza pandemic resulted from a disease process that began with a severe acute viral infection that spread down the respiratory tree causing severe tissue damage, which was often followed by secondary bacterial invasion. 

VI. CARDIOLOGY

The Jury is Still Out on Medicated Stents

The long-term effects of treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, have not been established. As a result, a meta-analysis, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2007;356:1030-1039) was performed on individual data on 4,958 patients enrolled in 14 randomized trials, by comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents (mean follow-up interval, 12.1 to 58.9 months). The primary end point was death from any cause. Other outcomes included stent thrombosis, the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction, and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or reintervention. Results showed that the hazard’s ratio [HR] for the overall risk of death of 1.03 and the combined HR of the risk of death or myocardial infarction of 0.97 were not significantly different for patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents. There was a significant reduction in HR of the combined risk of death, myocardial infarction, or reintervention of 0.43 associated with the use of sirolimus-eluting stents. There was no significant difference in the overall risk of stent thrombosis with sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents. However, there was evidence of a slight increase in the risk of stent thrombosis associated with sirolimus-eluting stents after the first year. According to the authors, the use of sirolimus-eluting stents does not have a significant effect on overall long-term survival and survival free of myocardial infarction, as compared with bare-metal stents. However, there is a sustained reduction in the need for reintervention after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents. The risk of stent thrombosis is at least as great as that seen with bare-metal stents.  

VII. REGULATORY AFFAIRS

TARGET HEALTH excels in Regulatory Affairs and works closely with many of its clients performing all FDA submissions. TARGET HEALTH receives daily updates of new developments at FDA. Each week, highlights of what is going on at FDA are shared to assure that new information is expeditiously made available.

Tekturna (Novartis) Approved for Treatment of Hypertension

The FDA has announced the approval of Tekturna (aliskiren) tablets for the treatment of high blood pressure, or hypertension. Hypertension affects an estimated 25% of Americans and causes increased risk of stroke, heart attack, kidney failure, heart failure and death. Tekturna, a new molecular entity (NME), is the first high blood pressure drug approved by FDA that inhibits renin, a kidney enzyme associated with the regulation of blood pressure. Tekturna acts at the beginning of the blood pressure regulation process, while other available high blood pressure medications act at later stages. The effectiveness of Tekturna in lowering blood pressure has been demonstrated in six placebo-controlled eight-week clinical trials, which studied more than 2,000 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The effect was maintained for up to one year. Tekturna was effective across all demographic subgroups, but African American patients tended to have smaller reductions in blood pressure than Caucasians and Asians, as is generally true for drugs that affect the renin-angiotensin system. When Tekturna was used in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic, further reductions in blood pressure were achieved. In terms of safety, Tekturna was evaluated in more than 6,460 patients, including 1,740 who were treated longer than six months, and more than 1,250 for over one year. Side effects were usually mild and brief. The most common side effect experienced by patients was diarrhea, reported by approximately 2% of patients on the higher of the two approved doses, compared with approximately 1% on placebo. Rarely, patients taking Tekturna developed an allergic reaction with swelling of the face, lips or tongue and difficulty breathing, as has been seen with other drugs for high blood pressure that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system. Tekturna and other drugs that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system should not be used during pregnancy because they can cause injury and even death to the developing fetus. Tekturna is manufactured by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, N.J. 

For more information about our expertise in Regulatory Affairs, please contact Dr. Jules T. Mitchel or Dr. Glen Park.

VIII. TARGET HEALTH

TARGET HEALTH INC. (www.targethealth.com) is a full service eCRO with full-time staff dedicated to all aspects of drug and device development. Areas of expertise include Regulatory Affairs, comprising, but not limited to, IND, IDE, NDA, PMA and 510(k) submissions, execution of Clinical Trials, Project Management, Biostatistics and Data Management, Web Trials, utilizing Target e*CRF®, our proprietary Internet-based Clinical Trial System, and Medical Writing. TARGET HEALTH's Pharmaceutical Advisory Dream Team (PADT) assists companies in strategic planning from Discovery to Market Launch. Let us help you on your next project.

TARGET HEALTH INC.
261 Madison Avenue
24th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 681-2100; Fax (212) 681-2105

Target Health Ad
www.targethealth.com
Dr. Jules T. Mitchel,
President
Ms Joyce Hays,
CEO

©2007 Target Health Inc. All rights reserved