ON TARGET
COMPLIMENTARY NEWS LETTER OF TARGET HEALTH
® INC.

30 July 2007

I.  WHAT'S NEW?
   
Target Health Web-Based Software For Clinical Trials
II.  QUIZ - (Fill In The Blanks)
    Stem Cells May Mend Broken Hearts [mice]
III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE
    Ancient Invention Increasingly Becomes High-Tech Marvel

IV. ORPHAN DISEASE
    Consequence of Treatment Interruption in Gaucher Disease
V. EPIDEMIOLOGY
    Is Being Fat a Contagious Disease?
VI. CARDIOLOGY
    Defibrillators Highly Effective in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

VII. REGULATORY AFFAIRS
   
Financial Disclosures
VIII. TARGET HEALTH

I.
WHAT'S NEW

Target Health Web-Based Software For Clinical Trials

Target e*CRF®, EDC Made Simple™ Version 3.1, now provides the randomization schedule without the need of Interactive Voice Response Systems (IVRS). You can also program most edit checks without the need to be a programmer and build most forms in an hour or 2. If it is in the Library, the time is reduced to a minute. Target Document® comes with a Trial Master File format already built in, and Target Encoder® accelerates MedDRA and WHO-DRUG coding.  All are 21 CFR Part 11 compliant and also fulfill EU Directive standards.

For more information about Target Health, please contact  Dr. Jules T. Mitchel. Visit our Blog and Website.

II. QUIZ (Fill  In The Blanks)

Stem Cells May Mend Broken Hearts [mice] 

Stem cells may help repair damaged 1) ___ after a heart attack. A study, done on mice, shows that stem cells play a limited, but significant role in 2) ___ damaged hearts. However, it remains unclear whether it is heart cells that are doing the repair, or cells from elsewhere in the 3) ___. Richard Lee and colleagues of the Harvard Medical School genetically engineered mice so their heart muscle cells could be stained with a fluorescent 4) ___. Around 80% of the heart 5) ___ cells in young mice picked up the stain. As the mice 6) ___, this level remained the same, which demonstrates that heart muscle cells are not normally replaced in life. However, when heart attacks were induced in the mice, the number of stained cells dropped to 70%, suggesting that new muscle cells are formed in response to injury. The study showed that the adult mouse 7) ___ has a limited ability to repair itself. The mechanism to activate cardiac 8) ___ is present, but it's inadequate. This could be, because mammals don't have enough [heart] stem cells? There are other theories as well. We need to understand what is holding the system back, so that we can devise a strategy to turn that brake off. Heart stem cells were first discovered last year. It’s not clear if this team has identified heart stem cells in the mice. Are they pre-existing immature cardiac muscle cells? Or are they [stem cells] from the heart or elsewhere in the body? Source: Nature Medicine (DOI: 10.1038/nm1618). 

ANSWERS: 1) tissue; 2) repairing; 3) body; 4) protein; 5) muscle; 6) aged; 7) heart; 8) regeneration 

III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE

Ancient Invention Increasingly Becomes High-Tech Marvel


Sandpaper, a seemingly simple tool for smoothing out rough surfaces, is much more complex than meets the eye and has increasingly become a high-tech marvel, according to an article in the July 23 issue of Chemical & Engineering News. Whether honing medical implants or shaping-up jet turbine blades, improved sanding techniques are smoothing the way toward technological progress. First used by the Chinese as early as the 13th century, sandpaper has evolved from an amalgam of crushed seashells bonded to parchment paper into a highly sophisticated process. The design of modern sandpaper, technically called a 'coasted abrasive,' involves a complex interplay between the chemical properties of the abrasive material, adhesive, and the backing material. Abrasives, or the gritty particles on sandpaper, can range from natural minerals, such as garnet or emery, to synthetic materials, such as fused aluminum oxide or silicon carbide. Choosing an abrasive can be a tricky task, as many materials can chemically react with the material being sanded or are too expensive for practical use. But today, computer programs can take the guesswork out of making sandpaper by modeling how an abrasive will perform, while the electron microscope has been used to optimize the structure of the tiniest abrasives. With the development of stronger materials, scientists have correspondingly developed stronger abrasives and improved bonding agents to allow for more aggressive sanding. From simple woodwork to high-end machining, there's no alternative to sandpaper.

IV. ORPHAN DISEASE

Consequence of Treatment Interruption in Gaucher Disease   

According to an article published in the Journal of Pediatrics (2007;151:197-201), a study was performed to document the effects of interrupting enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for at least 1 year in a group of children with type 1 Gaucher disease. For the study, all children with type 1 Gaucher disease who were treated at 2 pediatric centers and who were required to suspend ERT for at least 1 year were studied before, during, and after treatment interruption. Hemoglobin and platelet levels, organomegaly, growth, and bone manifestations were monitored. Results showed that 5 of 32 children experienced treatment interruptions. Before ERT, all children had splenomegaly, 4 children had hepatomegaly, 4 children had growth retardation, 3 children had skeletal manifestations, 3 children had thrombocytopenia, and 1 child had anemia. After 1 to 7 years of ERT, all children were growing normally, none had skeletal manifestations, organomegaly had decreased or disappeared, and hematologic features had improved. After 15 to 36 months of ERT interruption, splenomegaly recurred or worsened in all children, hepatomegaly and hematologic features recurred or worsened in 4 children, serious bone manifestations developed in 4 children, and 3 children experienced growth retardation. After at least 11 months of resumed ERT in 4 children, 2 had hepatomegaly, 2 had splenomegaly, and all had persistent skeletal manifestations. It was concluded that interruption of ERT in children with type 1 Gaucher disease should be avoided because it can cause recurrent organomegaly, growth delays, and skeletal manifestations that do not resolve after treatment reinstatement.

V. EPIDEMIOLOGY

Is Being Fat a Contagious Disease?    

The prevalence of obesity has increased substantially over the past 30 years. As a result, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2007;357:370-379), was performed to analyze the nature and extent of the person-to-person spread of obesity as a possible factor contributing to the obesity epidemic. The study evaluated a densely interconnected social network of 12,067 people assessed repeatedly from 1971 to 2003 as part of the Framingham Heart Study. The body-mass index (BMI) was available for all subjects. Longitudinal statistical models were used to examine whether weight gain in one person was associated with weight gain in his or her friends, siblings, spouse, and neighbors. Results showed discernible clusters of obese persons (BMI  30) were present in the network at all time points, and the clusters extended to three degrees of separation. These clusters did not appear to be solely attributable to the selective formation of social ties among obese persons. A person's chances of becoming obese increased by 57% if he or she had a friend who became obese in a given interval. Among pairs of adult siblings, if one sibling became obese, the chance that the other would become obese increased by 40%. If one spouse became obese, the likelihood that the other spouse would become obese increased by 37%. These effects were not seen among neighbors in the immediate geographic location. Persons of the same gender had relatively greater influence on each other than those of the opposite gender. It was concluded that Network Phenomena appear to be relevant to the biologic and behavioral trait of obesity, and that obesity appears to spread through social ties. And yes, these findings have implications for clinical and public health interventions.  

VI. CARDIOLOGY

Defibrillators Highly Effective in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 

Recently, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been promoted for prevention of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the effectiveness and appropriate selection of patients for this therapy is incompletely resolved. As a result, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (2007;298:405-412) was performed to study the relationship between clinical risk profile and incidence and efficacy of ICD intervention in HCM. The investigation was based on a multicenter registry study of ICDs implanted between 1986 and 2003 in 506 unrelated patients with HCM. To be included into the study, patients had to have been judged to be at high risk for sudden death and received and ICD. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Measured risk factors for sudden death included family history of sudden death, massive left ventricular hypertrophy, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitoring, and unexplained prior syncope. The main outcome measure was appropriate ICD intervention terminating ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Of the 506 patients, most were young (mean age, 42 years) at implantation, and most (439 [87%]) had no or only mildly limiting symptoms. Results showed that ICD interventions appropriately terminated ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in 103 patients (20%). Intervention rates were 10.6% per year for secondary prevention after cardiac arrest and 3.6% per year for primary prevention. Time to first appropriate discharge was up to 10 years, with a 27% probability 5 years or more after implantation. For primary prevention, 18 of the 51 patients with appropriate ICD interventions (35%) had undergone implantation for only a single risk factor. Interestingly, likelihood of appropriate discharge was similar in patients with 1, 2, or 3 or more risk markers. The single sudden death due to an arrhythmia (in the absence of advanced heart failure) resulted from an ICD malfunction. ICD complications included inappropriate shocks in 136 patients (27%). Based on the study results, it was shown that in a high-risk HCM cohort, ICD interventions for life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias were frequent and highly effective in restoring normal rhythm, and that an important proportion of ICD discharges occurred in primary prevention patients who had undergone implantation for a single risk factor. According to the authors, a single marker of high risk for sudden death may be sufficient to justify consideration for prophylactic defibrillator implantation in selected patients with HCM.

VII. REGULATORY AFFAIRS

TARGET HEALTH excels in Regulatory Affairs and works closely with many of its clients performing all FDA submissions. TARGET HEALTH receives daily updates of new developments at FDA. Each week, highlights of what is going on at FDA are shared to assure that new information is expeditiously made available.

Financial Disclosures 

On February 2, 1998, FDA published a final rule requiring anyone who submits a marketing application of any drug, biological product or device to submit certain information concerning the compensation to, and financial interests of, any clinical investigator conducting clinical studies covered by the rule. Under the applicable regulations (21 CFR Parts 54, 312, 314, 320, 330, 601, 807, 812, 814, and 860), an applicant is required to submit to FDA a list of clinical investigators who conducted covered clinical studies and certify and/or disclose certain financial arrangements as follows:

  1. Certification that no financial arrangements with an investigator have been made where study outcome could affect compensation; that the investigator has no proprietary interest in the tested product; that the investigator does not have a significant equity interest in the sponsor of the covered study; and that the investigator has not received significant payments of other sorts; and/or
  2. Disclosure of specified financial arrangements and any steps taken to minimize the potential for bias.
  3. Disclosable Financial Arrangements include:
  4. Compensation made to the investigator in which the value of compensation could be affected by study outcome.
  5. A proprietary interest in the tested product, including, but not limited to, a patent, trademark, copyright or licensing agreement.
  6. Any equity interest in the sponsor of a covered study, i.e., any ownership interest, stock options, or other financial interest whose value cannot be readily determined through reference to public prices.
  7. Any equity interest in a publicly held company that exceeds $50,000 in value. The requirement applies to interests held during the time the clinical investigator is carrying out the study and for 1 year following completion of the study; and
  8. Significant payments of other sorts, which are payments that have a cumulative monetary value of $25,000 or more made by the sponsor of a covered study to the investigator or the investigators' institution to support activities of the investigator exclusive of the costs of conducting the clinical study or other clinical studies,

If FDA determines that the financial interests of any clinical investigator raise a serious question about the integrity of the data, FDA will take any action it deems necessary to ensure the reliability of the data including:

  1. Initiating agency audits of the data derived from the clinical investigator in question;
  2. Requesting that the applicant submit further analyses of data, e.g., to evaluate the effect of the clinical investigator's data on the overall study outcome;
  3. Requesting that the applicant conduct additional independent studies to confirm the results of the questioned study; and
  4. Refusing to treat the covered clinical study as providing data that can be the basis for an agency action.

For more information about our expertise in Regulatory Affairs, please contact Dr. Jules T. Mitchel or Dr. Glen Park.

VIII. TARGET HEALTH

TARGET HEALTH INC. (www.targethealth.com)is a full service eCRO with full-time staff dedicated to all aspects of drug and device development. Areas of expertise include Regulatory Affairs, comprising, but not limited to, IND, IDE, NDA, PMA and 510(k) submissions, execution of Clinical Trials, Project Management, Biostatistics and Data Management, Web Trials, utilizing Target e*CRF®, our proprietary Internet-based Clinical Trial System, and Medical Writing. TARGET HEALTH's Pharmaceutical Advisory Dream Team assists companies in strategic planning from Discovery to Market Launch. Let us help you on your next project.

TARGET HEALTH INC.
261 Madison Avenue
24th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 681-2100; Fax (212) 681-2105

http://blog.targethealth.com
www.targethealth.com
Dr. Jules T. Mitchel,
President
Ms Joyce Hays,
CEO

©2007 Target Health Inc. All rights reserved