ON TARGET - Weekly Journal from Target Health Inc.

(Complimentary Newsletter from Target Health Inc.)

[Home] [Target e*CRO] [Target e*CRF] [Publications] [Press Release] [Advisors] [FDA Process] [Advertising]

16 October 2006

I.  WHAT'S NEW?
    
Global Clinical Trials At Target Health - Our Model
II.  QUIZ - (Fill In The Blanks)

    Scalpel-Free Obesity Surgery
III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE
    Vicks VapoRub
IV.
 GENETICS

    Genes and Prostate Cancer - Why Racial Differences?
V. NEUROLOGY
    
Rat Model of Alcoholism Shows Promise For Humans
VI. CARDIOLOGY
    
Lipitor Affects Atrial Fibrillation Post Cardiac Surgery
VII. DERMATOLOGY
    
Sunburn Incidence in the US - People Really Should Wear Hats
VIII. FDA
    FDA Enforcement of "Illegally" Marketed Drugs
IX.
TARGET HEALTH

I.
WHAT'S NEW

Global Clinical Trials At Target Health - Our Model

Target Health is involved with global studies through the use of Target e*CRF®. We have done studies on every continent except Antarctica. Because we perform EDC, we also perform data management, provide biostatistical services and perform medical writing, as these can be done out of our offices in New York. Because of our technology advancements on the web with Target e*CRF®, and now with Target Document®, we can also manage relatively small global trials. We are active participants in the Asian Clinical Trial Network, headed by our friend and colleague Young Jack Lee, Ph.D. (President Lifecord-Stat Korea). The ACTN covers Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Taiwan. We also collaborate in Europe, India and Eastern Europe. We are currently monitoring in Argentina and have monitored in Brazil. For global studies Target Health is cost effective and performs all project management under our Sr. Project Manager, Irene Ghilezan and Clinical Project Manager, Eve Jurewicz. We also speak fluent French, Spanish, Italian, Romanian, Polish, Korean, Chinese, and yes, English..

For more information about Target Health, please contact  Dr. Jules T. Mitchel.

II. QUIZ (Fill  In The Blanks)

Scalpel-Free Obesity Surgery

Obese individuals have a 50% to 100% increased risk of 1) ___ from all causes when compared with normal-weight individuals. Total health care-related costs associated with overweight and obesity are estimated to exceed $100 billion, a cost comparable to the economic costs of cigarette smoking. The 2006 Obesity Congress, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic, this past week, presented new data regarding scalpel-free obesity surgery. 2) ___ is fast becoming the most important public health issue in the United States and world wide. Stomach-stapling surgery to combat obesity may be done in the future with a tube inserted through the 3) ___, making the procedure safer and less costly, than using an 4) ___. Natural orifice transendoscopic surgery, or NOTE, requires no incisions because instruments -- such as long tubes with 5) ___ arms and staple guns -- can be inserted through the mouth and snaked down the esophagus. Another possibility, is inserting a sleeve, or a tube, into the intestines that would interfere with 6) ___ absorption. Approximately, two-thirds of U.S. residents are overweight, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 25, making obesity a major 7) ___ health issue. Obesity is linked to an increase in other dangerous conditions, including heart disease, several types of cancer, high blood pressure, type-2 diabetes, stroke, asthma, sleep apnea, liver disease and a number of orthopedic problems.

ANSWERS: 1) death; 2) Obesity; 3) mouth; 4) incision; 5) robotic; 6) calorie; 7) public

III. HISTORY OF MEDICINE

Vicks VapoRub

Lunsford Richardson was born in 1854 on a farm near Lunsford, NC. While working in Greensboro, NC Richardson developed a number of home remedies under the name of Vicks. Eventually there were 21 Vicks Family Remedies. One balm product included menthol, a new and little known drug from Japan. Since the product was used just externally, there was no risk of stomach upset. It was originally called Vicks Salve, before it became VapoRub. In 1898, he sold his drugstore and formed Lunsford Richardson Wholesale Drug company, one of only 4 wholesale drug companies in North Carolina. Then in 1905 he sold the wholesale drug company and founded Vicks Family Remedies Company which became Richardson-Merrell Inc, and then Richardson Vicks Inc. Initially, Vicks struggled to sell outside the Greensboro area until Lunsford's son, H. Smith, decided to concentrate just on the renamed VapoRub, the one unique and distinctive product of the 21 products.

IV. GENETICS

Genes and Prostate Cancer - Why Racial Differences?   

According to the National Cancer Institute, the annual incidence of prostate cancer among African American men is 277 per 100,000 compared to 168 per 100,000 for white men. The annual death rate from prostate cancer is 73 per 100,000 for African American men compared to 30 per 100,000 for white men. Family history is the most significant risk factor known for prostate cancer among all men, including African Americans. According to an article published online in the journal The Prostate (9 October 2006), using genetic markers, several regions of the human genome have been identified that likely contain genes that, when altered, increase the risk of developing prostate cancer. This study is the first genome-wide linkage study of prostate cancer in African Americans. The study was designed to identify genetic risk factors for prostate cancer and to help determine if heredity plays a role in the disparity in prostate cancer rates seen in African American men. The African American Hereditary Prostate Cancer (AAHPC) study network recruited 77 African American extended families which resulted in a total of 418 study participants. The families studied came from Chicago, Detroit, Houston, New York, Washington, D.C., Atlanta and South Carolina. All of the families studied had at least four men who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Using genetic markers, it was possible to map several important regions of the human genome that likely contained genes that, when mutated, predispose these men to developing prostate cancer. According to the authors, it is now necessary to sift through millions of bases of genome sequence to identify the proverbial needle in the haystack.

V. NEUROLOGY

Rat Model of Alcoholism Shows Promise For Humans   

Relapse to uncontrolled drinking after periods of sobriety is a defining characteristic of alcoholism and is often triggered by stress. According to a study published online in the Early Edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 October 2006), a new investigation in rats shows that a specific receptor for a stress-response transmitter may play an important role in stress-induced relapse. The study was designed to examine stress-induced relapse in rats that were bred to have a greater-than-normal preference for alcohol. These rats provide an excellent model for identifying genes involved in stress-mediated relapse in that not only do they voluntarily consume large amounts of alcohol, but they also display anxiety and depression-like traits. These latter traits are characteristics that are common among human alcoholics and which indicate a maladaptive response to stress. For the study, a series of behavioral experiments confirmed that the alcohol-preferring rats were more sensitive to stressful situations. For example, the rats explored a new environment significantly less than did the normal rats, and also remained immobile longer than normal rats did in the novel environment. Each group of rats then learned that, by pressing a bar, they gained access to as much alcohol as they cared to drink. Under these conditions, the alcohol-preferring rats consume more than twice the amount of regular rats, and did so in order to obtain the intoxicating effects of alcohol. This behavior was extinguished, or unlearned, by a 15-day period during which bar-pressing yielded no alcohol, thus allowing the alcohol-preferring rats to achieve a state of sobriety. The investigators then assessed whether a stressful stimulus, such as a mild electric foot shock, would induce the rats to again seek alcohol by resuming the bar- pressing behavior. Results showed that alcohol-seeking was reinstated in the alcohol-preferring rats by foot shocks of much lower intensity than normal rats required. According to the authors, the resumption of alcohol-seeking by alcohol-preferring rats under these conditions is analogous to stress-induced relapse to drinking by human alcoholics. To determine if a particular gene or genes might underlie the stress-induced drinking of the alcohol-preferring rats, gene expression patterns were compared in the brains of rats from each group. The search focused on several families of known stress-related genes, including those associated with corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), which influences behavioral responses to stress through a number of different receptors. The study found that alcohol-preferring rats had higher expression levels of Crhr1, a gene encoding the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRH-R1). Subsequent experiments showed that antalarmin, a compound that blocks CRH-R1, suppressed alcohol drinking and completely blocked stress-induced reinstatement of drinking in alcohol-preferring rats, but had no effect on normal rats. As a result of these experiments, the NIH has begun to develop antalarmin for human use. The authors concluded that the Crhr1 genotype and its expression interact with environmental stress to reinstate alcohol-seeking behavior in this animal model of excessive drinking, and that the data provide a functional validation for antagonism at CRH-R1 receptors as a mechanism for novel treatments aimed at relapse prevention in susceptible individuals.

VI. CARDIOLOGY

Lipitor Affects Atrial Fibrillation Post Cardiac Surgery

Atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery is associated with increased risk of complications, length of stay, and cost of care. Observational evidence suggests that patients who have undergone previous statin therapy have a lower incidence of postoperative AF. As a result, a study published in Circulation (2006;114:1455-1461), was performed to test this observation in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. For the study, 200 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, but without previous statin treatment or history of AF, were enrolled. Patients were randomized to atorvastatin (Lipitor; 40 mg/day, n=101) or placebo (n=99) starting 7 days before the operation. The primary end point was incidence of postoperative AF; secondary end points were length of hospitalization, 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP). Results showed that atorvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of AF versus placebo (35% versus 57%, P=0.003). Accordingly, length of stay was longer in the placebo versus atorvastatin arm (6.9±1.4 versus 6.3±1.2 days, P=0.001). Peak CRP levels were lower in patients without AF (P=0.01), irrespective of randomization assignment. Multivariable analysis showed that atorvastatin treatment conferred a 61% reduction in risk of AF (odds ratio 0.39; P=0.017), whereas high postoperative CRP levels were associated with increased risk (odds ratio 2.0; P=0.01). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days was similar in the 2 treatment groups. The authors concluded that treatment with atorvastatin 40 mg/day, initiated 7 days before surgery, significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative AF after elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and shortens hospital stay. The authors added that the study results may influence practice patterns with regard to adjuvant pharmacological therapy before cardiac surgery. 

VII. DERMATOLOGY

Sunburn Incidence in the US - People Really Should Wear Hats

It is well known that sunburn is a major preventable risk factor for skin cancer. What is not known is how many people in the US experience sunburn each year. As a result, a study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2006;55:577-583) was performed to investigate risk factors for sunburn on the 2003 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. For the study, a random sample of 207,776 respondents provided data for the population-based survey. The main outcome measure was any report of sunburn within the previous 12 months. Results showed that overall, 39% of respondents had at least one sunburn. The strongest factors associated with sunburn were age and socioeconomic factors. Sunburn prevalence was greatest in respondents 18 to 24 years old (61%). This group was more likely to have a sunburn than respondents 45 to 54 years of age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.76). Higher income and higher levels of education were positively associated with sunburn (OR 1.67 and 1.63, respectively). Individuals reporting recent binge drinking also had a higher prevalence of sunburn (OR = 1.33). The limitations of this study is that it does not include data on skin type or sun protection behavior, and thus, the impact of these factors was not assessed. The authors concluded that in spite of all the known risks of getting sunburned, sunburn occurs at a very high rate in the United States.

VIII. FDA

TARGET HEALTH excels in Regulatory Affairs and works closely with many of its clients performing all FDA submissions. TARGET HEALTH receives daily updates of new developments at FDA. Each week, highlights of what is going on at FDA are shared to assure that new information is expeditiously made available.

FDA Enforcement of "Illegally" Marketed Drugs

Before enactment of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) of 1938, drugs could be marketed in the United States as long as a drug's label did not present false information regarding the drug's strength and purity. The FFDCA first established the requirement that a manufacturer has to prove the safety of a drug before the manufacturer could market it in the US. In accordance with that statute, drugs marketed before the passage of the FFDCA were "grandfathered" so that manufacturers, if they did not change the representations on the drugs' labels, were allowed to continue to market them unless evidence was developed to indicate that they were not safe (referred to as pre-38 drugs). However, once a manufacturer changed the representation on a pre-38 drug's label, that drug was considered by the FDA to be a "new drug" and the manufacturer was required to prove that the drug was safe for its intended use. In 1962, the FFDCA was amended to require that drugs sold in the US be regulated more closely. Under the provisions of the Drugs Amendments of 1962 (Public Law 87-781), all new drugs now have to be shown to be both safe and effective in adequate studies before they can be marketed. This legislation also applied retroactively to all drugs approved as safe from 1938 to 1962 (referred to as pre-62 drugs). These pre-62 drugs were permitted to remain on the market while evidence of their effectiveness was reviewed. The program established under which the FDA would review the effectiveness of drugs approved between 1938 and 1962 was named the Drug Efficacy Study Implementation (DESI) program. The intent was that if the DESI review indicated a lack of substantial evidence of a drug's effectiveness for all of its labeled indications, the FDA will publish a Notice of Opportunity for a hearing (NOOH) in the Federal Register concerning its proposal to withdraw approval of the drug for marketing. At that time, a manufacturer of that drug or identical, related or similar (IRS) drugs had the opportunity to request a hearing and provide FDA with documentation of the effectiveness of the drug product before a final determination is made. Drugs for which a NOOH has been published are referred to as less-than-effective (LTE) drugs.

The FDA has issued a new compliance policy guide (CPG) describing how it intends to exercise enforcement discretion with regard to drugs marketed in the US that do not have required FDA approval for marketing. The CPG applies to any drug required to have FDA approval for marketing, including new drugs covered by the Over-the-Counter (OTC) Drug Review, except for licensed biologics and veterinary drugs. FDA estimates that, currently, perhaps as many as several thousand drug products are marketed illegally. Once an illegally marketed product is identified, taking enforcement action against the product would typically involve one or more of the following: requesting voluntary compliance; providing notice of action in a Federal Register notice; issuing an untitled letter; issuing a Warning Letter; or initiating a seizure, injunction, or other proceeding. In order to make the best use of scarce FDA resources, FDA has prioritized enforcement efforts. In general, in recent years, FDA has employed a risk-based enforcement approach with respect to marketed unapproved drugs. This approach includes efforts to identify illegally marketed drugs, prioritization of those drugs according to potential public health concerns or other impacts on the public health, and subsequent regulatory follow-up. FDA is not required to, and generally does not intend to, give special notice that a drug product may be subject to enforcement action, unless FDA determines that notice is necessary or appropriate to protect the public health. The issuance of this guidance is intended to provide notice that any product that is being marketed illegally is subject to FDA enforcement action at any time. The only exception to this policy is, as set forth elsewhere, that generally products subject to an ongoing DESI proceeding or ongoing OTC drug monograph proceeding (i.e., an OTC product that is part of the OTC drug review for which an effective final monograph is not yet in place) may remain on the market during the pendency of that proceeding and any additional period specifically provided in the proceeding (such as a delay in the effective date of a final OTC drug monograph). However, once the relevant DESI or OTC drug monograph proceeding is completed and any additional grace period specifically provided in the proceeding has expired, all products that are not in compliance with the conditions for marketing determined in that proceeding are subject to enforcement action at any time without further notice (see, e.g., 21 CFR 310.6).

For a copy of the compliace guide and/or more information about our expertise in Regulatory Affairs, please contact Dr. Jules T. Mitchel or Dr. Glen Park.

IX. TARGET HEALTH

TARGET HEALTH INC. (www.targethealth.com) is a full service e*CRO with full-time staff dedicated to all aspects of drug and device development. Areas of expertise include Regulatory Affairs, comprising, but not limited to, IND, IDE, NDA, PMA and 510(k) submissions, execution of Clinical Trials, Project Management, Biostatistics and Data Management, Web Trials, utilizing Target e*CRF®, our proprietary Internet-based Clinical Trial System, and Medical Writing. TARGET HEALTH's Pharmaceutical Advisory Dream Team (PADT) assists companies in strategic planning from Discovery to Market Launch. Let us help you on your next project.

TARGET HEALTH INC.
261 Madison Avenue
24th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 681-2100; Fax (212) 681-2105

Target Health Ad
www.targethealth.com
Dr. Jules T. Mitchel,
President
Ms Joyce Hays,
CEO

©2006 Target Health Inc. All rights reserved