April 30, 2018Neurology
Following head injury, the protective lining that surrounds the brain may get a little help from its friends: immune cells that spring into action to assist with repairs. According to a study published online in Nature Immunology (16 April 2018), scientists from the National Institutes of Health watched in real-time as different immune cells in the mouse took on carefully timed jobs to fix the damaged lining of the brain, also known as meninges. The meninges are a collection of membranes that line the central nervous system and help protect brain and spinal cord tissue from various forms of injury. Damage to the meninges can cause cell death in underlying brain tissue. These results may help provide clues to the discovery that the meninges in humans may heal following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and why additional hits to the head can be so devastating. The study came about from an observation on MRI scans of adult patients who experienced a concussion or mTBI. Around half of patients with mTBI show evidence of injury to blood vessels in the meninges, which appears on MRI scans as a vascular dye leaking out of the damaged vessels. The authors found that while most patients had repaired their leaky blood vessels within 20 days, 17% of patients still showed leakage on their MRI scans three months after injury, indicating ongoing meningeal damage and incomplete recovery.
To learn more about the recovery process, the authors used state-of-the-art imaging tools to watch, in real-time, what happened in the mouse meninges up to one week after injury. They also developed a method of analyzing where immune cells gathered in the damaged meninges during the repair process. Results showed that within the first day of injury, immune cells from the blood called inflammatory monocytes entered the core of the injured meningeal tissue and started clearing away dead cells. These cells were assisted a few days later by a different type of blood monocyte that worked around the lesion edge to help rebuild damaged blood vessels, which were completely restored and fully functional within a week. It was observed that the actions of these different immune cell types did not overlap and that blocking the activity of one did not cause the other to take over.
The authors also found that the timing of a second head injury has a significant impact on the repair process in mice. A second injury experienced within one day of the first TBI led to additional inflammation and the wound healing phase of repair, during which blood vessels are fixed, did not occur. However, if the re-injury occurred after a few days, once the wound healing phase had already begun, there was no effect on the meningeal repair process and blood vessels were rebuilt normally. According to the authors, the timing of a second head injury may determine whether the meninges can be repaired, since it has been shown on a cellular level, that two or more head injuries within a very short amount of time can have really dire consequences for the brain lining and its ability to repair. Thus it is possible that patients who did not fully recover following a head injury may have had problems with the first phase of the repair process.
Experiments revealed that the molecule matrix metalloproteinase 2 (Mmp2) may play a critical role in the restoration of blood vessels. The wound-healing immune cells release Mmp2, which breaks down the matrix, or glue, holding cells together, allowing room for blood vessels to be rebuilt. When Mmp2 was blocked, there was a large decrease in the number of vessels that were repaired. According to the authors, further research is needed to uncover additional molecules and genes involved in the repair processes and identify ways to speed up the course of recovery following head injury.